Our Universe, Science and Potentials in Review
Russ Otter October 2010
(For what it’s worth: Please think and enjoy!)
Section: One
Holy Grail: Particle Physics
(The Quantum – from which we all arise)
Natural Forces, along with energy and matter begin at the quantum level, just as Gravity does…
Even though “quantum gravity” currently seems to be a missing link: The Quantum - is gravities birth place, from which all matter and energy originates. I postulate however that Time and Space are exempt from an inscrutable beginning, as they are “Infinite”, just as possibly, as is gravity and other natural forces are, but that is a question, we may never have an absolute answer to.
The origins of all finite creation come from the quantum, at least this is the most we can hope to ever understand, as all else is of an infinite realm, and the infinite is not and will never be definable in terms that finite sentient beings can understand.
Our Universe(s) conscious understanding or rather foundation is built upon the solitary empire of quantum building blocks.
That is principle One. The “Quantum” is our Foundation in all we will come to understand - and perhaps, we may even glimpse - at its predecessor’s trigger: Therefore always define your mathematics and philosophical notions of Space and Time, in conjunction with all of the natural forces we are ruled by, based on their quantum roots. The current notion of “SpaceTime” is highly likely askew… I would suggest that All things are quantized: Remember even a straight line or circles are arguably a combination of bits.
So whether gravity, as well as space and time are quantized at a sub-atomic micro-level, and or a macro-level, or perhaps morph in the process, or not: Please remember that Natural Forces are created equal at a base level, even as Space and Time are constants within both infinity and a finite existence.
However, in the examination of nature and the truth of our existence of matter and energy, the question often becomes, what is the “Beginning or the End”? I would offer that such a question can never be answered. As the Alpha and the Omega are of an “Infinite” nature, which will never be defined by “Finite” mathematics or philosophy. As to define “Infinity” would be to no-longer make it infinite. In other words you cannot circumscribe infinity, otherwise, if you could define infinity, it would, logically no longer be infinite, but finite.
Infinity by definition and nature is not definable.
This is principle Two: The infinite is not and never will be defined by the finite, or differently said, by finite sentiency.
And finally principle Three: (Which I would assume will create the most controversy amongst modern day physicists and perhaps some philosophers) Is that Space and Time are immutable (Fixed and unchangeable). They do not change, whether at the Event Horizon, nor does Time curve. Space, as with anything physical, does curve relative to gravities influence. NOTE: I will argue in in the next section: titled “Science: Is infinitely more than it seems…” of this treatise, that contrary to previously miss-calculated scientific testing, from my bias point of view, that Time and Space do not change via acceleration or lack thereof. Time and Space, as will all things, are impacted by gravity, but not to the point of changing space or time. I will soon explain.
Additionally as you read this document, perhaps rather than beginning with the principles of “Thermodynamics”, as sacrosanct, I would suggest you try to begin with these principles, which I have outlined above, and our math and science will thereby define our physical empire and its riches; such as virtually infinite energy will be manifest, for all practical description’s purposes, from the simple and logical mechanics these 3 principles portend.
And these riches, which I speak of, I believe, will help unite the world, in common union, for the good.
Section Two:
Science: Is infinitely more than it seems…[ Classic (Macro world) and Quantum (Micro world) ]
They underpin one another, but they are not based on the same math or logic. They are distinct in dimension, is the best way I would describe them.
Theoretical Physics is hard enough to follow, let alone understand, as it has its own language and bizarre concepts that actually defy the logic of the world we live within. For instance, the concept of “Entanglement” whereby micro-sized particles millions of miles apart respond to one another or communicate as if they were local to each other, whereby the speed of light does not apply. This is a proven phenomenon, also known as locality and non-locality behavior. The jargon of classical mathematics and quantum mechanics or the macro and micro worlds do not operate the same. This is of a confusing level, much as the concept of “infinity” is an impossible term to grasp. [That of which has no beginning and no end.] But I am printing my thoughts here for the few of you who may be involved with quantum physics and may be able to possibly forward my thoughts on to a forum that may take up the issues I raise below. It is my shot in the dark – to convey issues that have since my early adolescence and even younger captured my imagination. And I do hope some of you find it of interest…
So read at your own will. As I have stated the language and concepts do really require some background in this bizarre field of “quantum mechanics” to really even get close to grasping what is being explained. Coupled with the fact, that I take my own liberties with my own conceptions to further confuse the issues. However my goal is to clear up, what I believe to be some former misconceptions. Clearly too many of you, much of this will seem a grand heresy, but I would ask that you consider the broad scope of what we still do not know, and still may be errant in our current understandings regarding physics so-called proven laws.
The search for the “unified theory of nature or existence” is a fickle road in conventional terms. Quite simply because we live within an existence that is inscrutably possessed of “Infinity”. Infinities - cannot and will not succumb to classic mathematics. In fact classical mathematics breakdown and are void, outside of the macro-world or the real world of objects that we live within.
We also live within the “micro-world” or “particle-world” of quantum mechanics, that are the building blocks of our object world, made from atoms, quarks, electrons, photons, and so on, along with the world of what is known as “entanglement” and “superposition’s”, that defy all classical or common logic. Quite clearly, just as infinity defies explanation, if you try to extrapolate, or describe entanglement” and “superposition’s in mathematical terms. It simply will not, and cannot be done.
That is why I would call the quantum world, which underpins and creates our “real world”, the 5th dimension. In other words: There are the 3 physical dimensions (up/down,back/forward,side to side), plus time, plus the quantum or infinity realms, that are separate dimensions in my view. And both the macro and micro-worlds contain the Four-Forces we know of in the physics world, as the “strong, weak, electromagnetic, and gravity forces. These forces are the glue and engine of the dimensions we exist within. I understand the argument about the search for the fleeting notion of “quantum gravity”, but as I stated in section one, Quantum Mechanics is the bearer of all physical things, and gravity is one of them… If you have mass, you have gravity. If you have no mass, you are subject to gravities influence. NOTE: With the exception of “Entanglement”. Entanglement is a mystery of which I believe has its roots in non-particle, wave science. But that is perhaps a question that will defy explanation, much as infinity forever will.
I would also add 2 sub-dimensions to the quantum world: Number One: Particle and Number Two: Wave. These are the transmission modes of the micro and macro world. And they do behave quite differently, and often in tandem, unlike they always do in the macro-world or object-world we live our daily lives within.
1. Quantum Particle transport is based on the speed of light as defined by Albert Einstein.
2. Wave transport, I would argue, is a continuous (connected method of transport) that allows for “Entanglement” to occur. (In my opinion) Quantum Entanglement represents the concept of “infinity in action”, it is a non-locality based transport that is always connected, as if all separated objects were based on the concept of “locality”. Waves are connected, making the notion of “Everything, Nothing - and Nothing, Everything” all at the same moment in time. This is where classical math breaks down and we have to rely on a new methodology and understanding of time and space, hence “Infinity” to describe existence per se. It is that complicated and that simple. Or Indescribable…
Secondly, for accuracies sake, there may be 5 or 6 more dimensions if “string theory” is correct, but those are of the quantum micro-world, bound to the indefinable quantum dimension we are infinitely bound too.
• I am a layperson with a basic understanding of the world in which we live. And these realms or dimensions are the basics; we are both simplistically born into, and currently all capable of understanding. But understanding is a qualified term, as some things can and cannot be understood: The paradox of life…
With the passing of Time which is a misnomer in its own right, given the “special theory of relativity”, for which I will explain in a moment, we will expand our understanding, thus increase our knowledge of the forever and infinitely non-understandable. That is the ultimate truth we are compelled to, as finite beings, existing within an infinite realm. “Simply: We are always and infinitely expanding our knowledge.” In other words, some things Are Not understandable, given that you are a finite being within and infinite realm. Finite by definition cannot grasp the infinite. This is both of a philosophical point as well as a mathematical, as they are synonymous. Synonymous, due to the fact that classical math as I have stated before breaks down at the point of some aspects of the quantum world and its “entanglement” or infinite underpinnings that allow our world, or our very existence to occur.
I will use time, as we have defined it in classical mathematical terms to illustrate, at least to me, that our perceptions of time today through the lens of Einstein’s special relativity is not accurate.
As I explain my thought processes, keep in mind what I have said about the “Quantum” and the “Relative” worlds, or the “micro and macro” realms of physics: They are different in virtually every way. The macro and micro worlds are affected differently by gravity, by the tandem travel of waves and particles in the micro world, and by entanglement amongst other inscrutable behaviors. They are of two dimensions, if you will. Think of the very famous thought experiment of “Schrodinger’s Cat”. It is a bogus argument, because it involves both the macro world of the “Cat” and the micro world of “quantum mechanics” to enable the description of the cat being both alive and dead at the same time, or in a superposition. This can never be, as superposition’s and entanglements are restricted to the quantum or micro world of atomic particles. This is what has been done with speaking about an astronaut traveling at near the speed of light, and behaving the same way as muons, or their remnants electrons do. It is a spurious scenario, that continues to mislead us, as we explore time and space. Simply put: macro biology or physiology, does not change with velocity, outside the normal changes that gravity imposes on impacting our normal heart or breathing rates. Yet we have continued to discount or ignore this monumental difference when we engage our mathematical or particle experiments. It is comparing apples to elephants!
Time: The notion of time as changing due to the speed of travel is a misguided concept. It is accurate in theory, but not in fact. My Theorem: “Time is immutable, just as Space is. Both are underpinned by infinity and quantum mechanics, which dismantle classic mathematics and physics as we might hope to simply define them.” This is a simple theorem, that speaks clearly for itself.
In other words “time and space” are fixed and outside of our finite understanding. They do not change, as “Special Relativity” implies, by curving or slowing down or speeding up dependent on speed and mass. They can be described as such in a quasi-manner, but in fact they remain as they are. Infinite and inexplicable.
The current understanding of time is based on mass and velocity, or Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity, but time is again, as I said immutable, and subject not to the speed of an object, relative to its mass, but to its mass alone, subject to gravity. In other words all objects will not slow down or speed up based on the speed by which we travel. The current experiments that use atomic clocks: One clock stationary and the other traveling at high speed and then are used to measure their times which are logically different, is fatally flawed. Time is effected by way of the mechanical operation of atomic clocks, which is influenced by the gravity or mass it experiences within its travel. Again in other words, if a clock is traveling at a high velocity, it experiences greater gravity in a shorter period of time, which alters its mechanical functions. Time does not actually change only the forces of gravity that impact its mechanics changes and slows down the clocks mechanical operation. Thus density or gravity slows down or speeds up a clocks mechanical parts and physical time actuations. Time is not changed, only the operation of the clock subject to different mechanical pressures are changed. In simple terms, a clocks time is always going to be different based on its atmospheric conditions, i.e., whether it is stationary on the ground at sea level or sitting on the highest mountain. The mechanics will work differently, but time itself, has not changed, only the clocks mechanics have been altered by different pressures, so the times will infinitesimally be different. Extrapolate this using the speed of light and gravities changes, and the clocks show much different time results. But again, time itself has not changed only the physical apparatus that measures time has changed. Time remember is immutable. [Period]
Time has been manipulated by mixing the dimensions of Classic mathematics and Quantum mechanics realms - as if they were one. They are not. This has distorted our perceptions of the immutable and unchangeable nature of time and the notions of a curved space. [ Classic Standard Relativity and Quantum mechanics are unique and distinct. That simple, and this premise of confusing the two with the same assumed mathematics has miss-led us, very understandably, but also, very obviously. ]
I will attempt to give an example:
We need to first dispel the notion of curved space. This is another concept derived from the concepts of the speed of light and mass. This is not the truth of our obscure and infinitely indescribable existence.
It seems to me that Time and Space are immutable. Contrary to current belief, they are as fixed as the cognitive notion of existence itself, or as immutable as the fixed solution to a geometric equation.
Time and Space have been determined to be changeable based on velocity and density, and consequently marry up into the term SpaceTime. The singular term has merit, since combined time and space are the common objects of physical dimension as we understand them. But the notion that time changes and that space curves are relative ways for language only to express the effects of gravity on those elements of energy and or mass. Curved space and Time Running Slow are even poetically acceptable terms, but not physically accurate facts.
Light only curves as would any other object of mass, when gravity impacts it. Without gravity it would not so-called curve. To be less confusing about what physically takes place during the curving of light is to describe the impacts of gravity on any object as simply changing the objects direction, due to the force of gravity. You may want to call this “curved space”, but it only convolutes a simple picture into an unnecessary description, that obscures classical physics.
Likewise the experiments that demonstrate time slowing down is a misguided misnomer. Time does not slow down, whether at the Event Horizon, or with an atomic clock running under different velocity from another atomic clock. Simply the mechanics of the (macro/micro) particles that operate the measurement tools (clocks) are impacted by gravity via high velocities and thus slow down both the quantum and standard relative pieces of mechanical matter that operate measuring devices. Time is not slowed down. Matter is the only element slowed down, by physical forces. Matter is not time. Time has no mass, i.e., it does not curve.
Time and Space are physically immutable. It is surprising to me that this simple fact seems to elude us or at least I have not seen it explained as such.
Even more surprising to me is that we have not harnessed continuous motion with the natural forces in the universe as we know them. I do not call it perpetual motion, since all mechanical matter decomposes (wears out) and replacement is necessary, so perpetual is somewhat of a misrepresentation technically. But continuous motion seems to be a reality that I have several ways I could explain to make this possible without fossil or other material fuels. Yet I never see much on the subject other than – it cannot be done because it violates a thermodynamic theorem? I would note if our theorems are based on the logic that “matter is time”, therefore time slows down, then I rest my case.
Please also see this article, where the second law of thermodynamics is challenged: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=how-nature-breaks-the-second-law. This article further supports my premise regarding “Energy” and its continuous potential.
In this next section: “Smart Energy Now”, I have partially detailed out how to provide for “continuous” motion and would like to work with someone in this field. I of course hope you find my explanations above of merit, so that I might find someone with the mathematical background, which I certainly lack, to work with me on this project.
Section Three:
Smart Energy Now…
Natural Forces in nature provide multiple endless Energy models, without expending fossil fuels. Is anyone willing to work with me, who has a physics background?
What will it accomplish?
Evolution on a monumental scale. Migrating from a fossil fuel world to an automated world devoid of expending fossil fuels. It will overnight, in unbounded terms, provide universal energy to the entire world, not just the industrialized nations or emerging nations. It will provide a unifying playing field for the people of all nations to find more common options in which to better communicate and improve our common understanding and standard of living.
Note: Even I believe these ideas sound as if I have a large dose of megalomania lodged into my grey matter, but it simply needs to be tested and moved forward. Even if I am only 90% correct, it could change energy production as we currently understand it today.
Why is it important?
To improve life, to advance conservation of precious fossil fuels for other uses. To change the world and provide it with greater possibilities. To liberate. As well as dramatically control carbon emissions from the planet, coupled with enabling universal energy to all individuals or societies who either require or desire it.
What are the anticipated outcomes?
Virtually near- free recycled-energy and or regenerated energy, provided by the current clean and robust elements of energy, such as “gravity”, “electrostatics”, “magnetism”. And all that implies.
What will be its enduring impact?
Forever alter the social structures and thereby the social requirements of the world. In other words energy provided on an equal playing field for all people will in effect tie us all closer together in function and in equal choices. It would theoretically replace monopolies and cartel’s with freedom. As well as being groundbreaking for all of physics, and all sciences in general.
Further Project Description:
This project began with me as a child, trying to figure out how to automatically run my tricycle and my little green army jeep that required peddling a wheel or armature bar to turn the wheels. I was obviously a lazy kid that did not desire to labor too much – taking too much physical laboring to peddle thru the sidewalks and streets - in my youthful days! I remember constructing the concept, using magnets, and then let the idea fade as I entered school and grew-up as a young man going to school and then on to my working career. Just before I retired, I was still intrigued by the idea, and began to construct the project in my garage, with some success. However I soon realized I needed a physics partner with a background in electronics, especially electrostatics and the mathematics to aid in the assumptions as well as scribe in the language of science - the calculated results. And as I knew that would take some higher levels of mathematical language, certainly beyond my expertise.
These multiple ideas of automatic energy, from my youth that I mused about, once detailed will give away the intellectual property, to anyone with a hint of conceptual capability. I am very willing to give the intellectual property away, but would like to work on the project.
In simple terms, you may think it violates the fundamental thermodynamic entropy theology, which we have all been indoctrinated with. By the way I consider thermodynamic science more a theology and manifest scotoma in our lexicon, rather than a fact. In my own humble opinion physics is incalculable, and to rely on definitions, is to limit physics or existence itself. Neither have limits, therefore - in my puny assumptive world – Physics is forever a living definition, as well as a fixed proof. Much as “Infinity is both sides of the same coin – at once.”
Therefore I will fundamentally argue that thermodynamic entropy is relative for “like” for “like” kinetic actions: which will diminish “force”, as it today properly outlines.
However if you change the “Like for Like” concepts when generating energy, you change the rules by which “thermodynamic entropy” was developed. In other words, If you use two dimensions to generate kinetic energy, complemented in equal response to one dimension, generating its own energy. You alter or augment the output energy produces. Hence the “like for like” action = reaction is modified and the results are not like for like. Action can multiply Re-action. This provides for a gear ratio that augments energy output using natural forces. As well as other forces (fossil fuels too.)
This process using natural forces, such as Electrostatics, Magnetism and Gravity, among other natural stores of energy in a form which is non-relative or in other words using a differential gear –ratio that trumps lost energy. This does so by way of leveraging opposite dimensions and gravity. Thus it changes the scientific or theological rules that constricted the methods used to define generic thermodynamics. In other words thermodynamics becomes truly dynamic, rather than static.
My clumsy written formulas: ( See D, G, 1D, CM, etc. definitions in “Bold” below )
1. Electrostatics created by: D² + G in Linear 1D = CM
2. M+ (+ & -) + G = CM * Note, Electrostatics could be included to augment output.
3. Combination of both formula’s to leverage ultimate energy output potential.
D = Dimensions G = Gravity CM = Continuous Motion E= Electrostatics 1D = 1 Dimension
Simply stated: It combines linear and non-linear actions to produce energy that is continuous.
NOTE: Two basic methods: 1. G&E (Gravity & Electrostatics) 2. M+G (Magnetism & Gravity)
Stated in another fashion, there are 2 forms of possible methods: 1) independent of electrostatics which uses Gravity and Magnetism) and 2 with the use of electrostatics in combined ways to achieve natural energy from natural forces:
1. Form: A Uses Dimensions x 2 (Down and Side to Side) run by Gravity (Non-Linear) generating electrostatics combined with a linear (Up) Dimension. This Linear and non-linear interaction provides the mechanisms to create a gear ratio that multiplies itself. Hence you gain continuous motion which could then provide for heat and other outputs to generate endless energy.
2. Form: B Uses both positive and negative Magnetism in graduated powers, to direct motion in an upward direction opposing gravity, and then uses electrostatics captured in the downward thrust to leverage additional energy, and then re-deployed again and again by magnetism alone in an upward motion. Note, the “electromagnetism” is not necessary, but a natural benefit that should be leveraged from the simple process of motion ( That both Gravity and Motion provide for).
Variations of these forms of operations are dependent on mechanical engineering.
• Additionally, electrostatics can be enhanced by using a circular glass ball for instance, with other internal triboelectric materials to augment the energy produced beyond the direct gravity effects of tribolelectic stimulus, using for example a Teflon tube and a glass ball. These two materials: 1) “Glass” and 2)”Teflon” are near opposites for electron transfer on the triboelectric scale, which generate electrostatics. The electrostatics would be captured within a capacitor for electric generation.
NOTE: I use the term “continuous motion”, vs. “perpetual motion”, since all mechanical matter decomposes (wears out). Perpetual is generally an accurate statement, save matter decay; for which at that point – motion ceases.
Thermodynamics fundamentally proposes that you cannot squeeze blood from a turnip. Or in other words, energy depletes, and will not sustain itself. But if you change the mechanical genetics of the turnip, you can. Metaphorically, and practically that can be accomplished when Energy and Matter are merged together in a completely clean and virtually innocuous manner. Simply you apply 3 dimensional forces in a manner which leverages 2 dimensions against or in complement to 1 dimension. Nature working at its best. That Simple.
With the “continuous motion” of matter, then heat or additional motion receptors can be activated generating excess energy, superseding the level of energy required to generate this continuous motion of matter. Thus continuous energy is produced by way of natural forces: (Gravity / Magnetism / Electrostatics).
Sounds highly improbable – given current thinking, but intellectually it is quite plausible. Again, my goal is to work with a lab of scientist’s to pursue this objective, as I have outlined above. It may seem obscure, but once I share the simple mechanics of this idea, I hope you will find it of interest and most importantly possible. If it is possible, the world changes. I know it sounds in large part to be more than just a bit delusional, but even if we leverage 90% of this potential, we succeed beyond what exists today and provide for the clean and necessary energy the world depends upon.
Ultimate objectives and gains:
Secondarily this project, if actualized, would certainly secure a Nobel Prize, due to its unique utilization of “continuous motion” and would therefore support the investment returns to the philanthropists and scientists involved. Foremost it will be “humanity changing” for the good. Providing a leap in the advance of science and living standards for the people of this world. It will expedite the integration of humanity buy tying us together via sources of energy necessary to improve communication and common living standards that would better integrate the world. Coupled with the saving of fossil fuels for other uses, combined with less pollution. And in that process it would hopefully improve understanding and common cause among us all, rather than living with the continuing social divides that hinder those decent objectives.
In sharing these thoughts on the potentials for energy production with new methodologies, it is my objective to hopefully find someone seriously interested to pursue these ideas.
Simply and profoundly that is my end goal.
These concepts are actually basic, and the mechanics I have in mind to build a working model, would not be difficult given access to scientists in the area of physics, and electrostatics’ along with some very common materials.
Summary:
We exist because of the concept called a “Paradox. Paradoxes have no answers, they can never be broken. They are the infinite fuel of existence itself.
These ideas I have shared have been a growing process, so they will seem somewhat contradictory or paradoxical at times, but at a basic level, they seek the same objective of simplifying perceptions, based as much on common sense, as on our ever evolving science. The Quantum world is truly our birth place, so it holds our commonality, but as its fundamental structure builds the matter we exist with and by, it may morph its fundamentals in the process. Simply, I believe to begin our scientific pursuits, we do best when we can start at the beginning, with a common foundation and with practical principles, which give rise to a better result in our end conclusions as we pursue the Holy Grail of knowledge.
My hope is that those of you that disagree, or find value with my points of thought, augment this discussion and we will in the end all move forward…
Final Thought:
The quantum world is the sole genesis of all we are, combined with the infinite realm, for which I believe bares the inscrutable nature of space and time, whether we as sentient philosophical beings - exist or not.
In my world view, if a tree falls, and no one’s there to hear it, it still makes a sound…
Infinity and evolution, survives us all… forever! But in the interim of our existence, this ebb and flow throughout time, I believe enhances knowledge. Therefore with the growth of true knowledge we will improve the betterment of how we treat one another. Consequently, science is the basis for all truth, hence either the practical or metaphorical face of god, if you believe in such things. As science underpins philosophies truths and failures, as well.
Therefore science is a worthy journey indeed…
Friday, October 8, 2010
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
Our Universe and Potentials in Review
Russ Otter October 2010(For what it’s worth: Please think and enjoy!)
Section: One
Holy Grail: Particle Physics
(The Quantum – from which we all arise)
Russ Otter October 2010(For what it’s worth: Please think and enjoy!)
Section: One
Holy Grail: Particle Physics
(The Quantum – from which we all arise)
Natural Forces, along with energy and matter begin at the quantum level, just as Gravity does…
This is gravities birth place, from which all matter and energy originates. I postulate however that Time and Space are exempt from an inscrutable beginning, as they are “Infinite”, just as possibly, as is gravity and other natural forces are, but that is a question, we may never have an absolute answer to.
The origins of all finite creation come from the quantum, at least this is the most we can hope to ever understand, as all else is of an infinite realm, and the infinite is not and will never be definable in terms that finite sentient beings can understand.
Our Universe(s) conscious understanding or rather foundation is built upon the solitary empire of quantum building blocks.
That is principle One. The “Quantum” is our Foundation in all we will come to understand - and perhaps, we may even glimpse - at its predecessor’s trigger: Therefore always define your mathematics and philosophical notions of Space and Time, in conjunction with all of the natural forces we are ruled by, based on their quantum roots. The current notion of “SpaceTime” is highly likely askew… I would suggest that All things are quantized: Remember even a straight line or circles are arguably a combination of bits.
So whether gravity, as well as space and time are quantized at a sub-atomic micro-level, and or a macro-level, or perhaps morph in the process, or not: Please remember that Natural Forces are created equal at a base level, even as Space and Time are constants within both infinity and a finite existence.
However, in the examination of nature and the truth of our existence of matter and energy, the question often becomes, what is the “Beginning or the End”? I would offer that such a question can never be answered. As the Alpha and the Omega are of an “Infinite” nature, which will never be defined by “Finite” mathematics or philosophy. As to define “Infinity” would be to no-longer make it infinite. In other words you cannot circumscribe infinity, otherwise, if you could define infinity, it would, logically no longer be infinite, but finite. Infinity by definition and nature is not definable.
This is principle Two: The infinite is not and never will be defined by the finite, or differently said, by finite sentiency.
And finally principle Three: (Which I would assume will create the most controversy amongst modern day physicists and perhaps some philosophers) Is that Space and Time are immutable (Fixed and unchangeable). They do not change, whether at the Event Horizon, nor does Time curve. Space, as with anything physical, does curve relative to gravities influence. NOTE: I will argue in in the next section: titled “Science: Is infinitely more than it seems…” of this treatise, that contrary to previously miss-calculated scientific testing, from my bias point of view, that Time and Space do not change via acceleration or lack thereof. Time and Space, as will all things, are impacted by gravity, but not to the point of changing space or time. I will soon explain.
Additionally as you read this document, perhaps rather than beginning with the principles of “Thermodynamics”, as sacrosanct, I would suggest you try to begin with these principles, which I have outlined above, and our math and science will thereby define our physical empire and its riches; such as virtually infinite energy will be manifest, for all practical description’s purposes, from the simple and logical mechanics these 3 principles portend.
And these riches, that I speak of, I believe will help unite the world, in common union, for the good.
Section Two:
Science: Is infinitely more than it seems…[ Classic (Macro world) and Quantum (Micro world) ]
They underpin one another, but they are not based on the same math or logic. They are distinct in dimension, is the best way I would describe them.Theoretical Physics is hard enough to follow, let alone understand, as it has its own language and bizarre concepts that actually defy the logic of the world we live within.
For instance, the concept of “Entanglement” whereby micro-sized particles millions of miles apart respond to one another or communicate as if they were local to each other, whereby the speed of light does not apply. This is a proven phenomenon, also known as locality and non-locality behavior. The jargon of classical mathematics and quantum mechanics or the macro and micro worlds do not operate the same. This is of a confusing level, much as the concept of “infinity” is an impossible term to grasp. [That of which has no beginning and no end.]
But I am printing my thoughts here for the few of you who may be involved with quantum physics and may be able to possibly forward my thoughts on to a forum that may take up the issues I raise below. It is my shot in the dark – to convey issues that have since my early adolescence and even younger captured my imagination. And I do hope some of you find it of interest…
So read at your own will. As I have stated the language and concepts do really require some background in this bizarre field of “quantum mechanics” to really even get close to grasping what is being explained. Coupled with the fact, that I take my own liberties with my own conceptions to further confuse the issues. However my goal is to clear up, what I believe to be some former misconceptions. Clearly too many of you, much of this will seem a grand heresy, but I would ask that you consider the broad scope of what we still do not know, and still may be errant in our current understandings regarding physics so-called proven laws.
The search for the “unified theory of nature or existence” is a fickle road in conventional terms. Quite simply because we live within an existence that is inscrutably possessed of “Infinity”.
Infinities - cannot and will not succumb to classic mathematics. In fact classical mathematics breakdown and are void, outside of the macro-world or the real world of objects that we live within.We also live within the “micro-world” or “particle-world” of quantum mechanics, that are the building blocks of our object world, made from atoms, quarks, electrons, photons, and so on, along with the world of what is known as “entanglement” and “superposition’s”, that defy all classical or common logic.
Quite clearly, just as infinity defies explanation, if you try to extrapolate, or describe entanglement” and “superposition’s in mathematical terms. It simply will not, and cannot be done.That is why I would call the quantum world, which underpins and creates our “real world”, the 5th dimension. In other words: There are the 3 physical dimensions (up/down,back/forward,side to side), plus time, plus the quantum or infinity realms, that are separate dimensions in my view. And both the macro and micro-worlds contain the Four-Forces we know of in the physics world, as the “strong, weak, electromagnetic, and gravity forces.
These forces are the glue and engine of the dimensions we exist within. I understand the argument about the search for the fleeting notion of “quantum gravity”, but as I stated in section one, Quantum Mechanics is the bearer of all physical things, and gravity is one of them…
If you have mass, you have gravity. If you have no mass, you are subject to gravities influence. NOTE: With the exception of “Entanglement”. Entanglement is a mystery of which I believe has its roots in non-particle, wave science. But that is perhaps a question that will defy explanation, much as infinity forever will.
I would also add 2 sub-dimensions to the quantum world: Number One: Particle and Number Two: Wave. These are the transmission modes of the micro and macro world. And they do behave quite differently, and often in tandem, unlike they always do in the macro-world or object-world we live our daily lives within.1. Quantum Particle transport is based on the speed of light as defined by Albert Einstein.2. Wave transport, I would argue, is a continuous (connected method of transport) that allows for “Entanglement” to occur. (In my opinion) Quantum Entanglement represents the concept of “infinity in action”, it is a non-locality based transport that is always connected, as if all separated objects were based on the concept of “locality”.
Waves are connected, making the notion of “Everything, Nothing - and Nothing, Everything” all at the same moment in time. This is where classical math breaks down and we have to rely on a new methodology and understanding of time and space, hence “Infinity” to describe existence per se. It is that complicated and that simple. Or Indescribable…Secondly, for accuracies sake, there may be 5 or 6 more dimensions if “string theory” is correct, but those are of the quantum micro-world, bound to the indefinable quantum dimension we are infinitely bound too.
• I am a layperson with a basic understanding of the world in which we live. And these realms or dimensions are the basics; we are both simplistically born into, and currently all capable of understanding. But understanding is a qualified term, as some things can and cannot be understood: The paradox of life…With the passing of Time which is a misnomer in its own right, given the “special theory of relativity”, for which I will explain in a moment, we will expand our understanding, thus increase our knowledge of the forever and infinitely non-understandable.
That is the ultimate truth we are compelled to, as finite beings, existing within an infinite realm. “Simply: We are always and infinitely expanding our knowledge.” In other words, some things Are Not understandable, given that you are a finite being within and infinite realm. Finite by definition cannot grasp the infinite.
This is both of a philosophical point as well as a mathematical, as they are synonymous. Synonymous, due to the fact that classical math as I have stated before breaks down at the point of some aspects of the quantum world and its “entanglement” or infinite underpinnings that allow our world, or our very existence to occur.I will use time, as we have defined it in classical mathematical terms to illustrate, at least to me, that our perceptions of time today through the lens of Einstein’s special relativity is not accurate.
As I explain my thought processes, keep in mind what I have said about the “Quantum” and the “Relative” worlds, or the “micro and macro” realms of physics: They are different in virtually every way. The macro and micro worlds are affected differently by gravity, by the tandem travel of waves and particles in the micro world, and by entanglement amongst other inscrutable behaviors. They are of two dimensions, if you will.
Think of the very famous thought experiment of “Schrodinger’s Cat”. It is a bogus argument, because it involves both the macro world of the “Cat” and the micro world of “quantum mechanics” to enable the description of the cat being both alive and dead at the same time, or in a superposition. This can never be, as superposition’s and entanglements are restricted to the quantum or micro world of atomic particles.
This is what has been done with speaking about an astronaut traveling at near the speed of light, and behaving the same way as muons, or their remnants electrons do. It is a spurious scenario, that continues to mislead us, as we explore time and space.
Simply put: macro biology or physiology, does not change with velocity, outside the normal changes that gravity imposes on impacting our normal heart or breathing rates. Yet we have continued to discount or ignore this monumental difference when we engage our mathematical or particle experiments. It is comparing apples to elephants!
Time: The notion of time as changing due to the speed of travel is a misguided concept. It is accurate in theory, but not in fact. My Theorem: “Time is immutable, just as Space is. Both are underpinned by infinity and quantum mechanics, which dismantle classic mathematics and physics as we might hope to simply define them.” This is a simple theorem, that speaks clearly for itself. In other words “time and space” are fixed and outside of our finite understanding. They do not change, as “Special Relativity” implies, by curving or slowing down or speeding up dependent on speed and mass.
They can be described as such in a quasi-manner, but in fact they remain as they are. Infinite and inexplicable.The current understanding of time is based on mass and velocity, or Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity, but time is again, as I said immutable, and subject not to the speed of an object, relative to its mass, but to its mass alone, subject to gravity.
In other words all objects will not slow down or speed up based on the speed by which we travel. The current experiments that use atomic clocks: One clock stationary and the other traveling at high speed and then are used to measure their times which are logically different, is fatally flawed. Time is effected by way of the mechanical operation of atomic clocks, which is influenced by the gravity or mass it experiences within its travel.
Again in other words, if a clock is traveling at a high velocity, it experiences greater gravity in a shorter period of time, which alters its mechanical functions. Time does not actually change only the forces of gravity that impact its mechanics changes and slows down the clocks mechanical operation. Thus density or gravity slows down or speeds up a clocks mechanical parts and physical time actuations. Time is not changed, only the operation of the clock subject to different mechanical pressures are changed.
In simple terms, a clocks time is always going to be different based on its atmospheric conditions, i.e., whether it is stationary on the ground at sea level or sitting on the highest mountain. The mechanics will work differently, but time itself, has not changed, only the clocks mechanics have been altered by different pressures, so the times will infinitesimally be different. Extrapolate this using the speed of light and gravities changes, and the clocks show much different time results. But again, time itself has not changed only the physical apparatus that measures time has changed. Time remember is immutable. [Period]
Time has been manipulated by mixing the dimensions of Classic mathematics and Quantum mechanics realms - as if they were one. They are not. This has distorted our perceptions of the immutable and unchangeable nature of time and the notions of a curved space. [ Classic Standard Relativity and Quantum mechanics are unique and distinct. That simple, and this premise of confusing the two with the same assumed mathematics has miss-led us, very understandably, but also, very obviously. ]
I will attempt to give an example:We need to first dispel the notion of curved space. This is another concept derived from the concepts of the speed of light and mass. This is not the truth of our obscure and infinitely indescribable existence.It seems to me that Time and Space are immutable. Contrary to current belief, they are as fixed as the cognitive notion of existence itself, or as immutable as the fixed solution to a geometric equation.Time and Space have been determined to be changeable based on velocity and density, and consequently marry up into the term SpaceTime. The singular term has merit, since combined time and space are the common objects of physical dimension as we understand them. But the notion that time changes and that space curves are relative ways for language only to express the effects of gravity on those elements of energy and or mass.
Curved space and Time Running Slow are even poetically acceptable terms, but not physically accurate facts.Light only curves as would any other object of mass, when gravity impacts it. Without gravity it would not so-called curve. To be less confusing about what physically takes place during the curving of light is to describe the impacts of gravity on any object as simply changing the objects direction, due to the force of gravity. You may want to call this “curved space”, but it only convolutes a simple picture into an unnecessary description, that obscures classical physics.Likewise the experiments that demonstrate time slowing down is a misguided misnomer.
Time does not slow down, whether at the Event Horizon, or with an atomic clock running under different velocity from another atomic clock. Simply the mechanics of the (macro/micro) particles that operate the measurement tools (clocks) are impacted by gravity via high velocities and thus slow down both the quantum and standard relative pieces of mechanical matter that operate measuring devices. Time is not slowed down. Matter is the only element slowed down, by physical forces. Matter is not time. Time has no mass, i.e., it does not curve.
Time and Space are physically immutable.
It is surprising to me that this simple fact seems to elude us or at least I have not seen it explained as such.Even more surprising to me is that we have not harnessed continuous motion with the natural forces in the universe as we know them. I do not call it perpetual motion, since all mechanical matter decomposes (wears out) and replacement is necessary, so perpetual is somewhat of a misrepresentation technically. But continuous motion seems to be a reality that I have several ways I could explain to make this possible without fossil or other material fuels. Yet
I never see much on the subject other than – it cannot be done because it violates a thermodynamic theorem? I would note if our theorems are based on the logic that “matter is time”, therefore time slows down, then I rest my case.
Please also see this article, where the second law of thermodynamics is challenged: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=how-nature-breaks-the-second-law. This article further supports my premise regarding “Energy” and its continuous potential.
Please also see this article, where the second law of thermodynamics is challenged: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=how-nature-breaks-the-second-law. This article further supports my premise regarding “Energy” and its continuous potential.
In this next section: “Smart Energy Now”, I have partially detailed out how to provide for “continuous” motion and would like to work with someone in this field. I of course hope you find my explanations above of merit, so that I might find someone with the mathematical background, which I certainly lack, to work with me on this project.
Section Three:
Smart Energy Now…
Natural Forces in nature provide multiple endless Energy models, without expending fossil fuels. Is anyone willing to work with me, who has a physics background?
What will it accomplish?
Evolution on a monumental scale. Migrating from a fossil fuel world to an automated world devoid of expending fossil fuels. It will overnight, in unbounded terms, provide universal energy to the entire world, not just the industrialized nations or emerging nations. It will provide a unifying playing field for the people of all nations to find more common options in which to better communicate and improve our common understanding and standard of living.
Note: Even I believe these ideas sound as if I have a large dose of megalomania lodged into my grey matter, but it simply needs to be tested and moved forward. Even if I am only 90% correct, it could change energy production as we currently understand it today.
Why is it important?
To improve life, to advance conservation of precious fossil fuels for other uses. To change the world and provide it with greater possibilities. To liberate. As well as dramatically control carbon emissions from the planet, coupled with enabling universal energy to all individuals or societies who either require or desire it.
What are the anticipated outcomes?
Virtually near- free recycled-energy and or regenerated energy, provided by the current clean and robust elements of energy, such as “gravity”, “electrostatics”, “magnetism”. And all that implies.
What will be its enduring impact?
What will be its enduring impact?
Forever alter the social structures and thereby the social requirements of the world. In other words energy provided on an equal playing field for all people will in effect tie us all closer together in function and in equal choices. It would theoretically replace monopolies and cartel’s with freedom. As well as being groundbreaking for all of physics, and all sciences in general.
Further Project Description:
This project began with me as a child, trying to figure out how to automatically run my tricycle and my little green army jeep that required peddling a wheel or armature bar to turn the wheels. I was obviously a lazy kid that did not desire to labor too much – taking too much physical laboring to peddle thru the sidewalks and streets - in my youthful days!
Further Project Description:
This project began with me as a child, trying to figure out how to automatically run my tricycle and my little green army jeep that required peddling a wheel or armature bar to turn the wheels. I was obviously a lazy kid that did not desire to labor too much – taking too much physical laboring to peddle thru the sidewalks and streets - in my youthful days!
I remember constructing the concept, using magnets, and then let the idea fade as I entered school and grew-up as a young man going to school and then on to my working career. Just before I retired, I was still intrigued by the idea, and began to construct the project in my garage, with some success. However I soon realized I needed a physics partner with a background in electronics, especially electrostatics and the mathematics to aid in the assumptions as well as scribe in the language of science - the calculated results.
And as I knew that would take some higher levels of mathematical language, certainly beyond my expertise.
These multiple ideas of automatic energy, from my youth that I mused about, once detailed will give away the intellectual property, to anyone with a hint of conceptual capability. I am very willing to give the intellectual property away, but would like to work on the project.
In simple terms, you may think it violates the fundamental thermodynamic entropy theology, which we have all been indoctrinated with.
By the way I consider thermodynamic science more a theology and manifest scotoma in our lexicon, rather than a fact. In my own humble opinion physics is incalculable, and to rely on definitions, is to limit physics or existence itself. Neither have limits, therefore - in my puny assumptive world – Physics is forever a living definition, as well as a fixed proof. Much as “Infinity is both sides of the same coin – at once.”
Therefore I will fundamentally argue that thermodynamic entropy is relative for “like” for “like” kinetic actions: which will diminish “force”, as it today properly outlines.
However if you change the “Like for Like” concepts when generating energy, you change the rules by which “thermodynamic entropy” was developed. In other words, If you use two dimensions to generate kinetic energy, complemented in equal response to one dimension, generating its own energy. You alter or augment the output energy produces. Hence the “like for like” action = reaction is modified and the results are not like for like. Action can multiply Re-action. This provides for a gear ratio that augments energy output using natural forces. As well as other forces (fossil fuels too.)
This process using natural forces, such as Electrostatics, Magnetism and Gravity, among other natural stores of energy in a form which is non-relative or in other words using a differential gear –ratio that trumps lost energy. This does so by way of leveraging opposite dimensions and gravity. Thus it changes the scientific or theological rules that constricted the methods used to define generic thermodynamics. In other words thermodynamics becomes truly dynamic, rather than static.
My clumsy written formulas: ( See D, G, 1D, CM, etc. definitions in “Bold” below )1. Electrostatics created by: D² + G in Linear 1D = CM2. M+ (+ & -) + G = CM * Note, Electrostatics could be included to augment output.3. Combination of both formula’s to leverage ultimate energy output potential.
D = Dimensions G = Gravity CM = Continuous Motion E= Electrostatics 1D = 1 Dimension
Simply stated: It combines linear and non-linear actions to produce energy that is continuous.
NOTE: Two basic methods: 1. G&E (Gravity & Electrostatics) 2. M+G (Magnetism & Gravity)
Stated in another fashion, there are 2 forms of possible methods: 1) independent of electrostatics which uses Gravity and Magnetism) and 2 with the use of electrostatics in combined ways to achieve natural energy from natural forces:1. Form: A Uses Dimensions x 2 (Down and Side to Side) run by Gravity (Non-Linear) generating electrostatics combined with a linear (Up) Dimension.
Simply stated: It combines linear and non-linear actions to produce energy that is continuous.
NOTE: Two basic methods: 1. G&E (Gravity & Electrostatics) 2. M+G (Magnetism & Gravity)
Stated in another fashion, there are 2 forms of possible methods: 1) independent of electrostatics which uses Gravity and Magnetism) and 2 with the use of electrostatics in combined ways to achieve natural energy from natural forces:1. Form: A Uses Dimensions x 2 (Down and Side to Side) run by Gravity (Non-Linear) generating electrostatics combined with a linear (Up) Dimension.
This Linear and non-linear interaction provides the mechanisms to create a gear ratio that multiplies itself. Hence you gain continuous motion which could then provide for heat and other outputs to generate endless energy.2. Form: B Uses both positive and negative Magnetism in graduated powers, to direct motion in an upward direction opposing gravity, and then uses electrostatics captured in the downward thrust to leverage additional energy, and then re-deployed again and again by magnetism alone in an upward motion.
Note, the “electromagnetism” is not necessary, but a natural benefit that should be leveraged from the simple process of motion ( That both Gravity and Motion provide for).Variations of these forms of operations are dependent on mechanical engineering.
Additionally, electrostatics can be enhanced by using a circular glass ball for instance, with other internal triboelectric materials to augment the energy produced beyond the direct gravity effects of tribolelectic stimulus, using for example a Teflon tube and a glass ball.
These two materials: 1) “Glass” and 2)”Teflon” are near opposites for electron transfer on the triboelectric scale, which generate electrostatics. The electrostatics would be captured within a capacitor for electric generation.
NOTE: I use the term “continuous motion”, vs. “perpetual motion”, since all mechanical matter decomposes (wears out). Perpetual is generally an accurate statement, save matter decay; for which at that point – motion ceases.
Thermodynamics fundamentally proposes that you cannot squeeze blood from a turnip. Or in other words, energy depletes, and will not sustain itself. But if you change the mechanical genetics of the turnip, you can. Metaphorically, and practically that can be accomplished when Energy and Matter are merged together in a completely clean and virtually innocuous manner.
Simply you apply 3 dimensional forces in a manner which leverages 2 dimensions against or in complement to 1 dimension. Nature working at its best. That Simple.
With the “continuous motion” of matter, then heat or additional motion receptors can be activated generating excess energy, superseding the level of energy required to generate this continuous motion of matter. Thus continuous energy is produced by way of natural forces: (Gravity / Magnetism / Electrostatics).
Sounds highly improbable – given current thinking, but intellectually it is quite plausible. Again, my goal is to work with a lab of scientist’s to pursue this objective, as I have outlined above. It may seem obscure, but once I share the simple mechanics of this idea, I hope you will find it of interest and most importantly possible.
If it is possible, the world changes. I know it sounds in large part to be more than just a bit delusional, but even if we leverage 90% of this potential, we succeed beyond what exists today and provide for the clean and necessary energy the world depends upon.
Ultimate objectives and gains:
Secondarily this project, if actualized, would certainly secure a Nobel Prize, due to its unique utilization of “continuous motion” and would therefore support the investment returns to the philanthropists and scientists involved.
Foremost it will be “humanity changing” for the good. Providing a leap in the advance of science and living standards for the people of this world. It will expedite the integration of humanity buy tying us together via sources of energy necessary to improve communication and common living standards that would better integrate the world.
Coupled with the saving of fossil fuels for other uses, combined with less pollution. And in that process it would hopefully improve understanding and common cause among us all, rather than living with the continuing social divides that hinder those decent objectives.
In sharing these thoughts on the potentials for energy production with new methodologies, it is my objective to hopefully find someone seriously interested to pursue these ideas.
Simply and profoundly that is my end goal. These concepts are actually basic, and the mechanics I have in mind to build a working model, would not be difficult given access to scientists in the area of physics, and electrostatics’ along with some very common materials.
Summary:
We exist because of the concept called a “Paradox. Paradoxes have no answers, they can never be broken. They are the infinite fuel of existence itself.
These ideas I have shared have been a growing process, so they will seem somewhat contradictory or paradoxical at times, but at a basic level, they seek the same objective of simplifying perceptions, based as much on common sense, as on our ever evolving science.
We exist because of the concept called a “Paradox. Paradoxes have no answers, they can never be broken. They are the infinite fuel of existence itself.
These ideas I have shared have been a growing process, so they will seem somewhat contradictory or paradoxical at times, but at a basic level, they seek the same objective of simplifying perceptions, based as much on common sense, as on our ever evolving science.
The Quantum world is truly our birth place, so it holds our commonality, but as its fundamental structure builds the matter we exist with and by, it may morph its fundamentals in the process. Simply, I believe to begin with a common foundation and actually practical principles, which give rise to a better result in our end conclusions as we pursue the Holy Grail of knowledge.
My hope is that those of you that disagree, or find value with my points of thought, augment this discussion and we will in the end all move forward…
Final Thought:
Simply said, the quantum world is the sole genesis of all we are, combined with the infinite realm, for which I believe bares the inscrutable nature of space and time, whether we existed or not.
In my world view, if a tree falls, and no one’s there, it still makes a sound…
Infinity and evolution, survives us all… forever! But in the interim of our existence, our ebb and flow throughout time, I believe enhances knowledge, and therefore can and will improve the betterment of how we treat one another. Consequently, science is the basis for all truth, hence either the practical or metaphorical face of god, if you believe in such things.
Therefore science is a worthy journey indeed…
My hope is that those of you that disagree, or find value with my points of thought, augment this discussion and we will in the end all move forward…
Final Thought:
Simply said, the quantum world is the sole genesis of all we are, combined with the infinite realm, for which I believe bares the inscrutable nature of space and time, whether we existed or not.
In my world view, if a tree falls, and no one’s there, it still makes a sound…
Infinity and evolution, survives us all… forever! But in the interim of our existence, our ebb and flow throughout time, I believe enhances knowledge, and therefore can and will improve the betterment of how we treat one another. Consequently, science is the basis for all truth, hence either the practical or metaphorical face of god, if you believe in such things.
Therefore science is a worthy journey indeed…
Sunday, August 29, 2010
Open our Hopes, our Goals, our Realities: based through the Prism of Physics – and we all will improve.
Thermodynamics is threaded through the firm notions of relativity’s mathematics. In other words, force, mass, and movement or acceleration are seemingly straightforward when mathematics is defined and applied against the backdrop of the rules defined by thermodynamics.
By the way: Thermodynamics is simply the science of energy and heat, based on its mathematics that seemingly binds us to its rules.
With exception, if the force, mass and acceleration are manipulated in combination by both linear and non-linear directions of thermodynamic movement, based on using the forces of simple gravity, among other natural energy sources, then the results will differ from the traditional fixed notions of our heretofore science of thermodynamics. But as of yet, no one seems to understand this, or has manifested such an application.
Meaning that Entropy and the other rules of thermodynamics, while inevitable: just as a shoe with use, will become worn out with time, you also can extend that worn out shoe, 100-fold, rather than like for like or (action for re-action equivalency). In other words, energy is only lost based on an equal level of energy applied. However - Energy can be applied with a ratio bases, that mathematically creates more action for a re-action, than a like for like result. Thus you can create a virtually continuous motion machine, with the exception of parts eventually wearing out and needing to be replaced.
I have written other articles on this subject matter, but no one seems to take it seriously, or I am not explaining it well enough to engender some reaction or reaching the correct audience. If my hypothesis is true, then we change the very dimensions of the world, in almost every discipline that you can imagine. And all for the better…
I would hope someone with a physics or electromechanical background, would contact me. And please read some of my Science specific Blog’s, especially the one related to “Continuous Motion” as I hope they will shed some further light on this subject.
This type of purely physics based / mathematical energy solution, will additionally bring us together as a single human race of people, rather than as disparate groups competing harmfully with each other. This physics can change the world in personal matters as well as mathematical ones.
NOTE: We live within confined thinking built upon the philosophical and mechanical rules of the past. For instance, does the concept of “Inflation” at the start of the Big Bang, hold to Einstein’s, cosmic speed limit of light. No. But we make adjustments in our thinking to accommodate that seeming violation of physics. Similarly Thermodynamics has some areas that bend as well. But they bend within the confines of logical mathematics, that we have simply not explored - as of yet. And I would note that the “Bane” contention for the infinite quest of explaining history and time, is a true possibility too.
The open fields of physics and mathematics are unbounded infinities, which are in bloom at every moment, for the taking, by those who seek truth.
However, the real truth is that many a truth - was discovered by mistake! But - Oh’ Well, I digress.
Clearly truth is holding at bay our pre-formed modes of thoughts-travels, docked in self-made impressions, or in other words our scotomas, just waiting to sail away and change the symphony of infinity’s seas, that reality holds - forever open.
The possibilities of physics, of mathematics, of the progression of reason, hold the hope of the ages, the Holy Grail of truth, not from the static fixations of the past, but of the knowledge born in the moment, from the shoulders of the past, and our ever evolving future.
By the way: Thermodynamics is simply the science of energy and heat, based on its mathematics that seemingly binds us to its rules.
With exception, if the force, mass and acceleration are manipulated in combination by both linear and non-linear directions of thermodynamic movement, based on using the forces of simple gravity, among other natural energy sources, then the results will differ from the traditional fixed notions of our heretofore science of thermodynamics. But as of yet, no one seems to understand this, or has manifested such an application.
Meaning that Entropy and the other rules of thermodynamics, while inevitable: just as a shoe with use, will become worn out with time, you also can extend that worn out shoe, 100-fold, rather than like for like or (action for re-action equivalency). In other words, energy is only lost based on an equal level of energy applied. However - Energy can be applied with a ratio bases, that mathematically creates more action for a re-action, than a like for like result. Thus you can create a virtually continuous motion machine, with the exception of parts eventually wearing out and needing to be replaced.
I have written other articles on this subject matter, but no one seems to take it seriously, or I am not explaining it well enough to engender some reaction or reaching the correct audience. If my hypothesis is true, then we change the very dimensions of the world, in almost every discipline that you can imagine. And all for the better…
I would hope someone with a physics or electromechanical background, would contact me. And please read some of my Science specific Blog’s, especially the one related to “Continuous Motion” as I hope they will shed some further light on this subject.
This type of purely physics based / mathematical energy solution, will additionally bring us together as a single human race of people, rather than as disparate groups competing harmfully with each other. This physics can change the world in personal matters as well as mathematical ones.
NOTE: We live within confined thinking built upon the philosophical and mechanical rules of the past. For instance, does the concept of “Inflation” at the start of the Big Bang, hold to Einstein’s, cosmic speed limit of light. No. But we make adjustments in our thinking to accommodate that seeming violation of physics. Similarly Thermodynamics has some areas that bend as well. But they bend within the confines of logical mathematics, that we have simply not explored - as of yet. And I would note that the “Bane” contention for the infinite quest of explaining history and time, is a true possibility too.
The open fields of physics and mathematics are unbounded infinities, which are in bloom at every moment, for the taking, by those who seek truth.
However, the real truth is that many a truth - was discovered by mistake! But - Oh’ Well, I digress.
Clearly truth is holding at bay our pre-formed modes of thoughts-travels, docked in self-made impressions, or in other words our scotomas, just waiting to sail away and change the symphony of infinity’s seas, that reality holds - forever open.
The possibilities of physics, of mathematics, of the progression of reason, hold the hope of the ages, the Holy Grail of truth, not from the static fixations of the past, but of the knowledge born in the moment, from the shoulders of the past, and our ever evolving future.
Saturday, July 24, 2010
Finite and Infinite (The Holy Grail that will never meet...)
Infinities are Reality: [ What the heck kind of jargon is this? Science / Humanity? ]
Well it is about the twain of our finite and infinite worlds we are bound within. And a twain that will never meet. But in that disparate truth, we simply are bound to grow for the better, as we are more similar than otherwise.
So goes our hope for knowing all things, or for our capability to understand in total what science or faith pursues, but not in vain, but certainly in failure, comprehensively speaking.
Mathematics is the very face of god, if you will, or in other terms: the face of truth and the goal to understand what the mind is capable of understanding… Beyond that finite reality, is an infinite reality were even math breaks down, and fails; for infinity is real and no mathematics is capable of defining infinity. Just ask a math major… (They can identify it, but they will never answer it.)
So it is true for us, of sentient minds, which reach for our understanding of infinity, for purpose, or for that notion of ultimate truth, or our search for a god, from within our finite existences. Again, our comprehensive understanding of all nature will fail, and it will always be so, as long as we are finite beings within an infinite realm.
This is the dilemma for those who believe in a scientific understanding of existence, of the Universe, with a capital “U”, not just our big bang universe, which is no more than the size of a single proton, in the true scheme of spatial reality or in other words, within our infinite reality…
We are captives of nature beyond our understanding, as long as we remain finite beings. Only an infinite structure, that by definition cannot be circumscribed by definition, can in theory know the truth of all things. In fact it can be argued that as an infinite structure or being, there is no such thing as “Knowing” or “Knowledge”, ego and the like. Infinity is without awareness, as awareness itself, would be a defined circumscribing and therefore limiting element that would preclude infinity. A conundrum of the first degree. But that is what infinity is. Indefinable [Period].
Factually, to believe in your capability to have any simple or complex perception of “Infinity” is to manifest a limited definition of infinity, therefore you violate the principle of infinity, which cannot be defined.
Hence we grapple with the ultimate conundrum of our very existence - of our finite and infinite worlds; which will never meet by way of knowledge.
Mathematics teaches us this truth… Sentient wisdom would do well to accept this truth.
Simply we live in an infinite fog, but by way of a finite existence. So find your truth inside the scope of your own space and time of life. And make it a good truth, one based on the “Golden Rule” and pursue knowledge at every crossroad of life.
That is all we have – nothing more, nothing less.
Cultures, Religions, Fads, can be good or bad, but they all are all vain and vacuous, unless they operate by truth and the golden rule.
And that is where we exist, accept it or not.
Again, Infinities are our Reality, which preclude our ultimate fullness of knowledge, but also give us an endless pursuit to grow… Hopefully for the better! As this truth makes us more similar than disparate - and that truth will enable growth to embrace a reality that improves on our lives and those about us…
PS… This is a refrain of my first Blog: “It Only Takes One Thing” (The Golden Rule), with a coupling of my Blogs on “Science” and the value science manifests for us all.
Well it is about the twain of our finite and infinite worlds we are bound within. And a twain that will never meet. But in that disparate truth, we simply are bound to grow for the better, as we are more similar than otherwise.
So goes our hope for knowing all things, or for our capability to understand in total what science or faith pursues, but not in vain, but certainly in failure, comprehensively speaking.
Mathematics is the very face of god, if you will, or in other terms: the face of truth and the goal to understand what the mind is capable of understanding… Beyond that finite reality, is an infinite reality were even math breaks down, and fails; for infinity is real and no mathematics is capable of defining infinity. Just ask a math major… (They can identify it, but they will never answer it.)
So it is true for us, of sentient minds, which reach for our understanding of infinity, for purpose, or for that notion of ultimate truth, or our search for a god, from within our finite existences. Again, our comprehensive understanding of all nature will fail, and it will always be so, as long as we are finite beings within an infinite realm.
This is the dilemma for those who believe in a scientific understanding of existence, of the Universe, with a capital “U”, not just our big bang universe, which is no more than the size of a single proton, in the true scheme of spatial reality or in other words, within our infinite reality…
We are captives of nature beyond our understanding, as long as we remain finite beings. Only an infinite structure, that by definition cannot be circumscribed by definition, can in theory know the truth of all things. In fact it can be argued that as an infinite structure or being, there is no such thing as “Knowing” or “Knowledge”, ego and the like. Infinity is without awareness, as awareness itself, would be a defined circumscribing and therefore limiting element that would preclude infinity. A conundrum of the first degree. But that is what infinity is. Indefinable [Period].
Factually, to believe in your capability to have any simple or complex perception of “Infinity” is to manifest a limited definition of infinity, therefore you violate the principle of infinity, which cannot be defined.
Hence we grapple with the ultimate conundrum of our very existence - of our finite and infinite worlds; which will never meet by way of knowledge.
Mathematics teaches us this truth… Sentient wisdom would do well to accept this truth.
Simply we live in an infinite fog, but by way of a finite existence. So find your truth inside the scope of your own space and time of life. And make it a good truth, one based on the “Golden Rule” and pursue knowledge at every crossroad of life.
That is all we have – nothing more, nothing less.
Cultures, Religions, Fads, can be good or bad, but they all are all vain and vacuous, unless they operate by truth and the golden rule.
And that is where we exist, accept it or not.
Again, Infinities are our Reality, which preclude our ultimate fullness of knowledge, but also give us an endless pursuit to grow… Hopefully for the better! As this truth makes us more similar than disparate - and that truth will enable growth to embrace a reality that improves on our lives and those about us…
PS… This is a refrain of my first Blog: “It Only Takes One Thing” (The Golden Rule), with a coupling of my Blogs on “Science” and the value science manifests for us all.
Monday, January 11, 2010
Science of Natural Energy - Continuous Motion
01/11/2010
Science of Energy and Thermodynamics
I need some help !
Science of Energy and Thermodynamics
I need some help !
This BLOG is a call for help, related to working on energy generation. I have written before on this subject but I am simply refining the science, as well as my personal perceptions – in the hope to find someone with a physics background and facilities to work with. In other words, My objective is to find someone interested in this subject matter with a physics/mathematical background to work with me, and again, I would hope this article may clarify some of the science behind heretofore impossible visions. But after just having read Dr. Michio Kaku’s, book: “Physics of the impossible”, I have been re-invigorated at the moment to pursue this subject matter once again. I am no maven of science, but have the same zest I believe many of us have, such as Alan Alda, to pursue the intrigue of science and its possibilities. To that end, I have some prototype ideas, I would like to pursue, but really need a University’s, or professional lab and the personal to work with.
In brief, I will explain the science behind this interest of mine:
Thermodynamics is a Newtonian methodology, which works well with the “macro world”, but has some dings in the armor, related to both the macro and quantum worlds. It is not entirely sacrosanct, as are most “absolute laws”, save perhaps for infinity itself.
However, I fully agree that the second law of thermodynamics is virtually sacrosanct, as all things atrophy or simply wear out.
I also agree with the third law: “That we cannot escape where we are”, sort to speak.
But the first rule of thermodynamics is based on the exhaustion of matter into energy, and thereby the resultant diminution of both matter and energy, so it implies.
In the quantum world, and even the macro world, some forces, such as sun, wind, geothermal, water (Damn Power plants), electrostatics, and magnetism, along with gravity are energy sources that do not require, the USER (us) - to use what is already naturally available, without any form of ignition or activation. In other words the energy is self-initiated.
These sources of energy break into two distinct forms:
1. Electrostatics, magnetism, and gravity are self manifesting. They are ripe for the picking. As they are not matter converted to energy in a conventional manner, but energy that is abundant as existence itself.
2. The other forms of energy from natural sources such as the Sun or geothermal are more terminal in a few billion years or so, but they are available by exploiting what is already being naturally produced.
I would argue in Form 1 above that these forms of energy completely afford us the ability to exploit without diminishing matter. In fact they afford us the ability to leverage a gear-ratio cohesion that augments energy. It does not deplete it.
Form 2 above, granted will diminish with time, but they are abundant and self-actuating all of the time, unlike the manual efforts to burn coal or natural gas. This self-actualized nature makes them sources that do not fully adhere to the intent of the first law of thermodynamics, but they do adhere to its final outcome.
In summary:
Electrostatics married with gravity and magnetism, can provide a geared-ratio of energy, that does not diminish matter, but in fact augments energy, save the entropy of thermodynamics law 2. These forms of energy actually create energy that is more abundant that in its sole standalone form. I believe I can take magnetism and gravity combined to create sustained, albeit subject to entropy (mechanical wear and tear) to generate abundant and virtually free energy.
As quantum physics progresses, this will also be found to be true I believe via the force of particle physics continuous motion found in quantum mechanics. We already are beginning to see this natural leverage of nature impact the future of computers, albeit some time off before it is refined.
At the heart of these potential changes is the key to a new future for international human cohesion. A beginning to a new era of hope for humankind, if I may be so bold. As the creation of energy, from energy will level the playing field for an improved communication, and equality around the world.
I do believe in “continuous motion”, not “perpetual motion”, due to the second law of thermodynamics or entropy, or what I synonymously call atrophy of materials. However the consequences of “Continuous motion” are the virtual equivalent of perpetual motion, and the results obviously – speak for themselves. If possible, which I currently surmise, then this reality changes the playing field for everyone toward a fairer and more balanced world.
- But I do dream…
I would really like to work with someone on this aspect of generating energy from energy. That simple.
If any of you know of an institute of science where a lay person can share their ideas please refer me to that organization or individual. This will seem very farfetched, I am certain, but in this Universe of many unknowns, the impossible is possibly possible… That is one of the lesson’s I learned from reading some of Dr. Michio Kaku’s books…
Sincerely,
Russ Otter
82612 Sky View Ln
Indio, CA. 92201
USA
Cell: 1.760.702.0843
www.otterworks.com [ Personal Family web ]
www.noahi.com [ Business Patent web site ]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)